How to Stress-Test Your Pitch Before the Meeting
Most founders walk into investor meetings with untested assumptions. The pre-mortem method finds the holes before they do.
You've rehearsed the deck. You know the numbers. You've practised the answer to "what's your moat?" But there's a category of question investors ask that most founders have never thought about — and it's not on any pitch prep checklist.
Why Preparation Usually Fails
Most pitch prep is defensive. You anticipate the questions you've been asked before and polish the answers. The problem: investors aren't asking the questions you expect. They're probing the assumptions underneath your answers.
The pattern
The Pre-Mortem Method
Pre-mortem analysis — developed by psychologist Gary Klein — asks you to imagine the project has already failed, then reconstruct why. Applied to pitching, it looks like this:
- 01
Set the scene
It is 18 months from now. The company failed. Not ran out of money — failed. What happened?
- 02
Write without editing
The constraint is important. Your first answers reveal what you actually believe, not what you wish were true.
- 03
Categorise by type
Group your failure reasons: market timing, distribution, defensibility, unit economics, team, regulation.
- 04
Prepare answers
Don't memorise a script. Have a real answer to what kills this in each category and what you are doing about it.
The Fermi Check on Your Market
The single most common fatal flaw in pitches we've analyzed: unqualified TAM claims. A Fermi estimation takes 5 minutes and tells you if your market number is real.
- →How many companies/people fit your exact ICP?
- →What percentage of them have the problem you solve right now?
- →Of those, what percentage would actually pay for your solution?
- →What would they pay per year?
Multiply those four numbers. That's your real TAM. If it's 90% smaller than what's in your deck, you have 24 hours to either fix the deck or build a better answer.
Stop guessing. Start knowing.
Apply this analysis to your pitch
Our AI runs Pre-Mortem, Fermi, and Inversion models on your specific idea. You get a structured teardown of every assumption you're making.
Run Analysis